Navigate / search

Travel Photography packing the gear

Whilst I was working on my “How to create simple panoramic photographs” post I realised that I was writing about how to approach panoramic photography without a tripod. The truth of the mater is tripods are generally heavy and lately I have done without it. I ended up writing this travel photography post without realising it and thought I’d share it first. So here is why I did not carry a tripod very often.

Traveling with photography gear is painful, it’s heavy and most airlines limit you radically on luggage weight both checked-in and on board. My photo bag when fully loaded weighs about 17kg far exceeding the limits add a tripod to this and we are reaching the 20kg. I used to sacrifice clothing to be able to take more gear. I since learned that more gear does not make for better photos and is more cumbersome than it is worth.

think-tank-rotation-360

So I plan my trips and the gear I’ll take. The first item to go has been my bulky heavy tripod for a lighter Carbon fibre model. The second was my big bag a Thinktank Airport Acceleration V2.0, I still have it but I bought a smaller one,  the Thinktank Rotation 360, it is comfortable, accessible and relatively light but most importantly convenient. What it brings to the party is it’s size, it forces me to think what I will be shooting and plan for it.
The only items that are always in my bag are:

  • A camera body, for now a Canon EOS 7D
  • A camera strap, a Blackrapid RS-4 Classic, I recommend it or something similar.
  • A few lens cloth, micro-fibre works but there are new great clothes around (I steal from my optometrist, it’s cheaper)
  • A pen and small note pad
  • A couple of tripod camera plates for the strap.
  • Spare camera batteries
  • Spare CF cards
  • Lensbaby Scout with the the Fisheye, Soft Focus and Sweet 35 Optics (Light an versatile)
  • A circular polarising filter

I regularly go down to Cape Town, I noticed that though I took my 100-400mm (1380g) and my 70-200mm (1310g) lenses (that is close to 3kg), I never used them because when I am in Cape Town I mostly shoot landscapes, seascapes and cityscapes so I mostly use my 16-35 wide angle lens. So I pack it now, I also use a 24-70mm (950g) lens enough to warrant it coming along for the trip. The only additional item over and above is a flash. This reduces my weight dramatically.

I also go to nature and wildlife parks, the bag configuration changes radically. The 100-400mm (1,380g) comes along for the trip but not the 16-35mm (635g), I will also take a 100mm Macro lens (625g) with a ring flash along, to shed weight I do not take my big flash (475g).

And lately, when I go photo walking, I only take one lens and sometimes the some Lensbabies along. Which lens you will ask? It will depend on the photo walk, but chances are that is will either be, more often than not, a 16-35mm (635g) or sometimes a 24-70mm (950g) though I suspect this will now be the lighter 24-105mm (670g) as soon as I get my elusive EOS 5D. Also, I will be taking my tripod on future walks, simply because it will force me to compose and think more, particularly with my HDR work and that the EOS 5D’s burst speed and 7 photo HDR bracket will not compensate for my moving anymore but that is in the future.

One last lens I think I should have with me always is the fantastic canon EF 50mm f/1.4 prime (290g), it’s not heavy. I keep on leaving it behind because on the EOS 7D it more an 80mm and it does not really work with what I do, with the EOS 5D coming this might just change.

The bottom line is that it all adds up and the spine can take so much.

Do I need a wide angle lens ?

Last Friday I was asked a pretty simple question: “Which wide angle lens should I buy? It is a lot of money and I want to make the right choice.” (paraphrased) There are no easy answer to such a question, it’s all subjective.

First of all, most modern DSLR kits come with a relative wide lens, a 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 that often comes with stabilisation. 18mm is considered wide, beyond that it becomes super wide to fisheye (ultra wide). Have a look at this article to get a good understanding of the “length” of a lens. In relative term a 50mm will give the photographer about a normal human field of view on a full size sensor, anything wider will be more than a human field of view. For example, some fisheyes go to 180 degrees field of view, with these ultra wide lenses there is a serious problem outside of the bubble and banding effects, if you are not careful your feet will be in the shot, so look down when you use these or you will be shooting your foot!

Example of a 8mm fisheye photograph. (On a 1.6 crop sensor)

Strand beach Fisheye

Example of a 16mm wide angle photograph. (On a 1.6 crop sensor)

Locked up Church

So coming back to the original question, do you need wider than 18mm, probably not, particularly if you are on a budget. In fact if you are on a budget and you only own a 18-55mm, my opinion would be to get a zoom lens in the 55-300 range. Most manufacturers have relatively good priced, entry level, lenses in that range such as Canon’s 70-300mm, Nikon’s a 55-300mm and SONY’s a 75-300mm also let us not forget Tamron, Sigma and other third party manufacturers. These would allow you to photograph some sports and wildlife amongst other things.

Now if you only have an 18-55mm kit lens, how do you create a wide angle view of a scene? I will cover an “How to create simple panoramic photographs” from shooting it to composing it in my next post.

First Impressions: Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens

I am not easily impressed by anything nowadays, call me blaze if you will. Through a series of unforeseen, though not unpleasant, events I became the owner of a Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM lens today. So, as one does, I mounted it on my camera, a Canon EOS 7D, and shot the first thing that came in sight. I knew off hand that the photo was going to a total fail, no light. I cranked up the ISO to 3200, set the lens to f/4 not expecting much at all, After all, anyone that fires a shutter at 1/15 sec at 50mm handheld should be shot for sheer incompetence.

Was I in for a surprise!!! It’s not tack sharp but… I’ll let the photo speak for itself!

Shot at f/4, ISO3200, 1/15 sec at 50mm with a Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

I shot this less than 20cm away, I even got a nice low depth of field! The IS is impressive!

Here is a crop of the cover, it’s not 1 to 1 but you’ll get the idea.

Shot at f/4, ISO3200, 1/15 sec at 50mm with a Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM (Croped)

Even my finger print is visible!

I was in for another surprise, here is the same image processed with Lightroom 4 (noise reduction at 100% only)

Shot at f/4, ISO3200, 1/15 sec at 50mm with a Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM (Croped and proccessed)

I’ll do some more testing but I have the feeling this is going to be my go to lens when I get my new camera.

A stormy evening in Kimberley

There are very few things that leave me in wander, African sunsets are one of these rare occasions where I often forget to pickup my camera and just enjoy the moment. There is something dramatic about African sunsets before or after a storm I cannot explain, it just is what it is.

This photo was shot in the Kimberley in 2007.

A stormy evening in Kimberley by Pascal Parent (PascalParent) on 500px.com

A stormy evening in Kimberley by Pascal Parent

Camera: CANON EOS 300D
Lens: Canon EF-S 18-55mm
2 photo panoramic


View Larger Map

Old Polariod Camera

photowalking is a great way to meet people and be a tourist in your own town at the same time but it’s also a great way to see the unseen, the little things. Here is an old Polaroid camera used by the South African military, just imagine what this camera may have snaped in it’s life? What stories it could tell us?

This photo was shot in the old Heidelburg prison in 2012.

Old Polariod Camera by Pascal Parent (PascalParent) on 500px.com

Old Polariod Camera by Pascal Parent

Camera: CANON EOS 7D

Lens: CANON EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L


View Larger Map